the story goes like this ...
Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.
But not only is it not true, it's not even accurate
- mrG's blog
- 1466 reads

![[cover:Seal of God]](http://www.teledyn.com/mt/archives/sealofgod.gif)




Easy to read, my 7yo
Easy to read, my 7yo deciphered it too. (other than Cambridge, which would not have been in her vocabulary)