Why Live Music
Friday, November 21, 2003

One cornerstone of the business model for the One-Track Universe is an assertion that fundamentally, in the very real human terms, recorded music isn't very important. Sure you probably have music playing now and a stack of recordings in your cache, but recordings are only the media, a poor substitute, playing in your environment now as an escape from the rest of the work and study environs because it reminds you of happier places ... and that place is where the music is live.

Think for a moment: What are your fondest music memories?

Just about any Torontonian my age can answer the question, "Where were you the night the Stones played the El Mo?" ... I know where I was: Walking by outside, saw the poster for April Wine and thought, "naw..." and asked the roadie on the street who said, calmly, "The Stones" and I thought, "Yeah right" and walked on by on my way to take some more slides off the 16" MacLennan telescope.

Now ask those same late boomers, "Where were you when the Stones released 'Some Girls'?" and you'll get blankness, even from people like me who were in the hype of the record business at the time. I dimly remember being told (by the rep) how Dire Straights were "The biggest thing since the Beatles" but I couldn't tell you the date.

Music defines a place. A time and place where we experience being. Recordings are mere shadows, holiday snapshots and fashion magazines to make us wish we were there, in that place, back there instead of here, where we are ...
At best, we remember some other life event concurrent with hearing our song or some-such, but for our memories about music, recordings can only take us there -- our passions and dreams are tangled up in a wish for the presence of being there. I still remember the choral music at the mass Canterbury Cathedral, "Stairway to Heaven" don't mean nuthin' anymore.

The Voice of Fire

In 1992 or so, I attended a robotics conference in Ottawa, disappointing because there was only one actual robot in attendance, but there I was with some of the grad students from our lab, most of them from far away lands. As part of our tourist wanderings, we took in the national art gallery so I could show off our national treasures.

One of those treasures was the newly re-deployed work by colour-field artist Barnett Newman, originally created for Canada's 1967 centennial and at that time the hot how dare they call that art news story, the infamous Voice of Fire.

My fellow travellers were incensed, especially at the price tag. What sort of nation would plunk that sort of money down on a red stripe? To tease them, when it came time to buy our souvenir postcards in the swag shop, I bought the VoF card, and was kidded over it all the way home.

But there's something peculiar about this postcard ...

Back home, scattering my cards on the kitchen table and mulling them all over a few johnny walkers, I noticed something remarkable: Every other gallery postcard features a canvas, in isolation, very occasionally with the frame, but usually just the canvas, all except this one.

This one print, in the postcard, on the web and in all the books, always shows the floor, the wall, the canvas and a person ... it always shows the place ...

This is the Place

Tell anyone, anywhere in the world, "Meet me at the Voice of Fire" and you can only mean one spot, one specific room in one specific building, totally unique, unambiguously one and only one place in all of time-space. The Voice of Fire.

Such was the genius of Newman's art, his stroke of genius: In the modern world, anyone can go to the nearest Athena Posters shop and buy a Kandinsky facsimile, or a Picasso, or a Rembrandt or Monet, they can frame it, hang it, and while it's not the original experience, these mass-produced knock-offs still capture a bit of the experience of the original. You can print them in a fine-quality art book and use slides to teach about their technique and composition and innovation; these prior works are eminently copyable, digitally bootleggable, and it's a hard slog for those who still try to sell such one-of wares.

But not the Voice of Fire.

Newman's canvas escapes the problem completely. To bootleg his canvas, you can only allude to the place, and to capture any sense of the experience, you have to go there and see it for yourself --- in one fell stroke of a stripe of red midst the deep blues, Barnett Newman defeated the entire reprint industry. They can copy his stripe all they wish, duplicate every non-variance of his pigment tone and brushwork, even blow their copies up just as high and mighty, but they cannot usurp his work's position as the Voice of Fire.

The National Art Gallery had purchased a place, a locus of attention as unique in it's experience of presence as the pyramids of Giza or Michaelangelo's David. Worth every penny, I say. Sheer brilliance.

Music is Now

Musicians need to learn from Barnett Newman's example. We often say that poets go first, followed by the painters, and then by musicians far in advance of the rest of our culture catching up to the new realities of perception. John Cage knew this as his own works embraced the aleatorics of the present tense and matured over the years into happenings and circuses, real time, real places, you should-a bin there.camp_e.jpg

We do see some of that, even in the digital age. Bono's world-stage media event concerts, distributed concert music over the CA*Net II, places on the timeline, milestones we can all use to mark the thread of our days. Woodstock, SARStock, Lilith Faire, sure, but also the uncapturable space-time events like R. Murry Schaffer's Soundscapes, Udo Kasemets' Duchampera

To ignore this in the digital age means a path of anonymous and viral mass-production. Only this ephemerial state of being the uncapturable, the marker of a place in time and space, the now of being here, this is the only option in a digital rebroadcast future, an inevitable convergence path for all art in a digital age.

And that future is here.

Submitted by mrG on Fri, 2003-11-21 11:42.


Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The ultimate copy protection

The ultimate copy protection. That's what it is, and it all came out in a conversation today happening on the SATURN-L mailing list where I was taken to task over my exhuberant and unrepentant fan-taping and sharing, and then having the unmittigated audacity and gaul to suggest that this was the digital age, and that nothing short of a strip search could prevent fan-recordings, so musicians (and promoters) had better grow up and just learn to live with it.

And that brought me back to this page, this story and the brilliant stroke of copy-protect genius that is the Voice of Fire.

time to wake up Margaret: the digital millenium is here. it arrived while you are out. Modern recorders are smaller than your thumb and take better sound than most FM stations; many cellphones have video capabilities using low-light CCDs. The McLuhan notion of technology extending our bodies now extends to our senses and our memory.

If you want to beat reproduction, here's how: Go to the National Gallery in Ottawa and look at Voice of Fire. It is astounding, and it totally defeats all attempts to reproduce it in books, texts, postcards ... and sneaky fan-photos like me (yes, I confess, I have covertly photographed art) How does it do this? By being. By its presence. Voice of Fire, look it up, google it (you will probably get my essay about it) [ie this page]

May has been listening to Sun Ra since we met. At first she thought I was in some kind of weird cult. She was right, of course, but the point is, she just didn't get it. My friends, same way. In the techno-enlightened 80's some of my friends would call it my "Time to Go Home music". Some liked Lanquidity and the trippier friends liked There Are Other Worlds; when it came time to go see Ra that first time in 1983 (I couldn't afford the Toronto 70's show, maybe I was in Winnipeg at the time anyway) I'd heard a whack of live bootlegs like the Donneschausen and Stockholm radio dubs I'd traded with the professor of architecture at U of Manitoba, and I knew I had to see this thing for myself.

There was, simply put, no comparison. I buy a "Yes" album and see them, it's the album with faces; I see the Stones in '66, it's the records with faces and Jagger's prancing, I'd seen Miles and Diz and Ornette in amphitheatres and small intimate clubs, but each was still only just a shade more than a nice quality stereo dub. But Sun Ra? Sun Ra defeated all that.

How did he do this? By being. By having an overwhelming all-embracing wrap-you-up-and-take-you-away presence.

My taping doesn't change that.

Far from it. My tapes, like the records, are like fuzzy pictures of Nessie, the porkpie-hat black smear of the UFO. But I saw it! you tell your friends and neighbours, but most just shake their heads and pity the poor kook's family. But I saw it, I felt it, I heard it and it was like St Therese with the arrow through her heart. Yeah, right. From some far out jazz band? He was born in Alabama, y'know.

Forget it, you can't make them see. Not unless you can coax them to come with you, and even that is no guarantee. But if they don't go, if they just stick it in their iPod, they are left out, though they still get left with that Mystery of why was he such a zealot about this band? Could they be? Do you suppose?...

You see, Sun Ra had also told his crew that if they only played music that machines could play, they were going to be out of a job because computers would overtake them and do it all faster cheaper better. I don't know that he said it in so many words, but he also clearly demonstrated how if you only play what can be captured in a bitstream, you are an endangered species so you can stand there in the headlights and chant that DRM will save you, or you can get the hell off the road and do something else. Sun Ra chose the latter path, a multidimensional Spirit Music that positively defies mechanical reproduction just as does the Voice of Fire.

Post new comment
  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <div><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <u> <i> <b> <tt> <span><blockquote>
  • You can use Textile markup to format text between the [textile] and (optional) [/textile] tags.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options