Nielsen numbers say our digital download market grew 120% last year, dwarfing the market growth in Digitally Restrictive markets like Europe (80%) or, worse still, the copy-restricted spooked market in the United States (65%). So why, asks the Canadian Music Creators Coalition, are foreign music labels still pressuring Ottawa to stifle fan-sharing? Why, they ask, do you sue our fans?
"The CMCC sees the 2006 sales numbers -- and the continuing success of the private copying scheme -- as a sign that there's no need to change Canada's copyright laws to enable record companies to sue our fans. Our music download market is growing faster than those in the US and Europe. To us, that seems like evidence that the Canadian government should focus on empowering Canadian musicians and protecting Canadian consumers from potentially harmful technology."
[ CMCC Congratulates Industry on Unparalleled Growth ]
Keep in mind too that these figures and concerns are for the Recording Industry, which, despite the rhetoric, is not the same thing as the Music Industry; the music biz, the business of musicians and songwriters and composers and arrangers and all sorts of singers of song and all the folks who make the gear, lessons, accessories and gadgets for their craft, that industry is doing exceedingly well. Globally.
They all say it's because people now carry music with them wherever they go, so they have lots of time to explore all kinds of new and interesting things, and lots more time to enjoy the mound of stuff they had, a mound that folks like Microsoft and Apple would dearly love to chain to one spot with draconian DRM.
When DRM Doesn't Matter
There's that scene at the end of Jim Henson's Labyrinth where the Goblin King confronts our heroine, and she realizes, "You have no power over me." and the entire scary castle flies apart, shattered and ineffectual.
DRM is obsolete, a non-concept in a TeledyN Hypercubic Computing Reality where my music and your music isn't really a posession, it is only an access right, invoked anywhere, at any time, no need to store jewel cases, no need to lug milk-crates of vinyl, no need to sync-up or back-up and no need to trade. Everything ever recorded by anyone, the audio-visual wikipedia; at a penny a listen or less, think about it, that works out on average to the same cost as you now pay for your tangible product listening habits, some of which you play to death, some of which you never played again.
Only, if it was a truly open catalog (and not the partisan corporate buddy dealings we have today) and if the cost was more transparent than a local phone-call, why would you ever need to 'own' the sound? What matters is the listening.
But that's for tomorrow's world -- for today, we'll have to endure the fights and just hope folks like the CMCC can stay the dragons while we all wait for the sunrise.
- mrG's blog
- 3707 reads

![[cover:Seal of God]](http://www.teledyn.com/mt/archives/sealofgod.gif)




Perhaps they can slay
Perhaps they can slay dragons! This just in from the CMCC mailing list:
Hi I fully agree in the need
Hi
I fully agree in the need of allowing people to enjoy whatever music they choose to listen to, and artists to perform their Works freely. Laws should Project both groups, as it is their desire, but we all know labels have the Money…
___________________
Submited by : Caballos
Aye, Caballos, you and I, we
Aye, Caballos, you and I, we have money too, and collectively considerably more of it, and thus our money carries a pretty hefty vote when you add it all up.
if we shift where we put those dollars, you can bet your bottom one that the record execs will change their tunes long before they give up their lattes and BMWs.