Why Did It Take Me So Long to Meet Jazz? — confessions of a high school jazz geek.

Following a tip from Peter Hum, teen blogger Rachel relates story I have to say was as true in 1972 as it is today:

What I’m trying to say is that I’m frustrated. I get frustrated when I read articles about how young people don’t listen to jazz anymore — as an elementary or junior high school student, how on earth was I supposed to find it on my own?

This realization began gnawing at me the moment I was accepted into the upper jazz band at West Ranch High School — I was playing piano for my junior high culmination ceremony and I got a tap on the shoulder from the junior high band director. I’d never spoken to him before. He only had one question for me: “Where were you?” He’d been managing a jazz band at the junior high, but the first time I’d ever heard about it was on the last day I would ever be attending the school. It was as if that jazz band was some secret that only the select few could know about — it was hidden from everyone but the band kids under the cover of football and spirit days and  honors classes at the junior high. Even later, I discovered that the neighbor that I’d been living next door to for eight years was a jazz fanatic — halfway into my sophomore year of high school.

Jazz isn’t supposed to be a secret. It’s intended to be shared — even my jazz teacher sometimes tells me that improvising is a compilation of everything you’ve ever heard. That’s why I smile when I hear about people like Jason Parker combating the whole “jazz is dead” notion by sharing their music with young people like me who didn’t have immediate access to it. Whether you’re a jazz musician, a jazz instructor, or just someone who’s got a penchant for jazz, please don’t give up on us. Please don’t conclude that we’re uninterested; please don’t assume that we’ll think jazz is boring. Granted, it’s probably a better idea to hand us Kind of Blue before you give us Vijay Iyer (even KKJZ’s Leroy Downs told me with a chuckle that “the world’s not ready for Vijay”). But by handing a kid a jazz record or taking him to a jazz show, you’re giving him a chance to discover something he never knew existed. He might not like it, and he might love it. Believe me, coming from my experience with jazz as that teenager who’s supposedly not listening to it anymore — it’s more than worth a shot.

Yes, I'd heard jazz before 1970, lots of it, it was everywhere in the 60's. James Bond movies, Peter Gunn and Pink Panther (or any Mancini soundtracks), my first real inspiration for musicianship probably came as much from a mesmerized pre-school watching of Rhapsody in Blue as from the jacket images on the rockabilly records my mother played, but it wasn't until Kenn played that Benny Goodman LP ... ironic in a way since Benny himself had lived a jazz-deficient existence before hearing the New Orleans sound at about that same age.

But the difference was, in 1970, out in the prairies, there was no obvious path for jazz instruction outside of a few scattered books like the Mickey Baker series, and it's here were I see another issue in Rachel's young-person's quest for jazz literacy: in order to teach jazz, teachers need to have jazz teaching resources.

This is of paramount importance. In the late 1950's, during the lean years for the waning big bands, a group of the old-school players established an innovative teaching project, the Lennox School of Jazz -- most of today's 'stars' in the jazz recording industry are alumni of the Lennox school, and among them one Jamey Aebersold.

Aebersold may not be a household name to the Jazz listeners out there, but in the practice of jazz post-Lennox there are two ubiquitous artifacts of mass production that shaped the landscape of jazz history more than any other, one of them the immortal handwriting of some unknown Berklee student who leaked their book of head charts out across the newly-invented photocopies network (aka The Fakebook, once upon a time sold to us by the same bloke who sold us other contraband) and, a bit later down the timeline, the Aebersold Jazz play-along books.

110 affordable volumes, maybe more by now, each with a play-along record featuring a rhythm-section accompanment, and covering a truly olympian spectrum of styles. This was the shape of jazz to come, the jazz that was to spread out into the world and into pubs, dance halls and venues across the planet.

But that was the thing: the only Jazz method taught was the Aebersold method, and it is a very good method worthy of mastery by anyone of any genre, but it is only a niche and, in many ways it is a snapshot, a freezing in time of the state of the jazz around the Lennox era. Bossa Nova, Swing, modal Bop, even up to exotic scales, it is all about playing the changes.

Miles said to 'Trane one day, "what happens when we can play all the changes?" and its that whole realm of the reality of the space of Jazz that seems exempt in the Aebersold method. It takes you all the way to Giant Steps but does not leap into Ascension; like the Zen saying that says how the reading of the Sutras can inch you up and up and up the pole, but at the end, you still must leap off ... so why not leap off from the start?

Sure there's the old joke about the incumbent roosters, one plays some Parker licks to audition, the next plays an Ornette solo and so forth until the old master Rooster calls them a bunch of young clucks and wakes the day with a simple Cock-a-doodle-doo adding that, before you can get anything going, you gotta know the Standards, but how many of the Standards bearers can play like Kid Ory, or like Mr Jelly Roll, or even care. Thing is, just as the Amish chose the 19th and not the 16th century to freeze their timeline, there is no real reason to base our approach to Jazz in 1955, other than the inertia of material.

There is hope, though, a new hope in the recent goings on at the Banff Centre where we've seen the likes of Darcy Argue and Ethan Iverson as guest instructors in a way very reminiscent of the Lennox School approach. It is a hope that is springing new shoots all over the place and if not revitalizing the jazz (I think the vitality was always there in the underbrush) Banff has been bringing it out and packaging the transmission into forms the kids can take home. Not enough to urge the local pub jazz trios to step beyond the comfort zone of the changes but definately enough to alert the Rachels of the world that there may be intelligent life out beyond Mancini themes and Weather Report.

I've heard too how the Sun Ra House has become a part-time school for the advancement of jazz music; I hope someday to see their method franchised the way the Shao-lin Monks have franchised their path to kung-fu excellence!

And who knows, maybe there's another Jamey Aebersold somewhere outthere, signed up for the next session, inspired to create new and effective packaged methods for teaching the New Thing, using the new media the way Jamey leveraged the old-world cheap/portable LP/Cassette/CD, maybe using real-time connections to bridge that great gap of geographic space between Lennox Avenue and Portage and Main, someday delivering that space fire tone science to the gradeschool!

Filed under  //   bigband   education   jazz   music   musicians   new media  
Viewed 15795 times - Favorited 0 times

Comments [0]

Bulldozing Lemmings

From the fine and caring folks who brought us the plague that killed our culture, we now have the confession in Photography in the Age of Falsification, "Nichols came back with a tale of how Disney's minions bulldozed lemmings off cliffs for the famous lemming-suicide sequence." Maybe I'm just an old prude, but doesn't it beg us to ask: Do we really want this company babysitting our children?

Submitted by mrG on Wed, 2002-09-11 10:22


Filed under  //   digital rights   disney   new media  
Viewed 5545 times - Favorited 0 times

Comments [1]

Send in the Blogs

From: Gary Lawrence Murphy 
Subject: Send in the Blogs
To: info@plesman.com
Cc: dwebb@itbusiness.ca
Date: 19 Mar 2002 22:00:34 -0500
Organization: TCI Business Innovation through Open Source Computing

Dear Editor,

Dave Webb's article "Blogging a dead horse" is very interesting for
two reasons. First, it is posted on a news website that is anything
but interactive (after a hunt for a "to the Editor" link, I gave up
and wrote to the main page "Help" link) Second, the article which sets
out to criticize blog culture summarizes itself by demonstrating why
blogging is suddenly so very popular:

"By the way, The Ellison quote? Lifted from the ineffable Ethel the
Blog (stommel.tamu.edu/~baum/ethel/blogger.html), one of your
better quality blogs."

"Better quality blogs" --- Dave Webb has become what we call a
"recommender", and Ethel has just moved up a point in the recommender
ratings for all those readers who know and trust Dave's judgement. I
could rest my case at just that point. But I won't because I enjoy
flogging the horse.

Blogging taken as isolated instances, nay anything online taken as
isolated cases, misses both the point and the value. What is a web
page? Diary, Biography, Links, Forum. What is Usenet? DBLF. Email
mailing lists? DBLF ... you probably detect the pattern.

What is a Blog? What's different here? David Weinberger's term
"Small pieces loosely joined" (www.evident.org) comes to mind. The
average blog is just one node in a great network of blogs, each
feeding the other, each monitoring, sifting, evaluating and
reproducing the other. Blogs are the Internet grapevine.

How are these blogs connected? Two ways, one explicit, one implicit
in the modern web. The implicit method is known to everyone: It's
called Google.

The explicit method is more reliable and far faster, and most often
built into the blogging software and is known in the trade as RDF. Our
company blog at www.teledyn.com, a very conservative but nonetheless
self-published 'zine-let on "open source and internet" exports a tiny
(XML) file containing our news headlines
. This file is picked up
12,000 times a day; we don't know by who, but we do know that a recent
blog article about a Linux virus-writing (and defense) guide caused an
international fury on the author's website within hours of our
posting.

What the virus-guide author's webhost experienced, and what Dave Webb
betrays in his confession on the Harlan quote, is what blog culture
calls "recommenders". Yes, each source blog itself is typically a
very low signal-to-noise ratio, but when filtered through the network
of recommenders feeding recommenders feeding recommenders, the signal
is very quickly refined; I just don't have the time to wade through
SlashDot (slashdot.org) but nary a day goes by when I don't learn of
some big news that broke first on its pages. What we have in blogging
is a human-intelligence controlled, highly efficient and massively
parallel content evaluation and distribution network.

Many blogs (our own included) are "meta-blogs", recommender
recommenders which distill the mash by personally selecting from many
sources, commenting on the value of the content of a few (adding
meta-data). Other people select their favourite meta-blogs and
summarize those, and then republish on their own blog, extending the
recommender process, adding meta-data.

There are also tools to assist this recommender process. For example,
here at TCI, in addition to mailing lists and personal contacts, we
use Rael Dornfest's highly experimental and (ahem) less than robust
Peerkat (www.oreillynet.com/~rael/lang/python/peerkat/) to merge over
200 blog and news-service channels. We coallate, summarize and
re-distribute these feeds over our intranet in about a dozen different
topical categories.

Other tools include Dave Winer's Radio Userland, OpenPrivacy's Reptile
(a similar project which is building recommender-rating into the feed
process), OpenCola who apply the blog-recommender
model to content discovery, the left-wing network of www.indymedia.com
makes the global local and vice versa, and the most ambitious of all,
the Columbia Newsblaster
combines blog-recommender methods with advanced semantic processing to
provide hot tips for journalists.

Does it work? Yes and very well. IT insiders (and not just the kids
but even us more "chronologically endowed") know that other insiders
will get the news long before any ITBusiness journalist. We know that
our collegues will get the news straight the first time, and we know
the blog network ensures that what some lone insider might publish
before their workday begins might reach ten thousand desktops before
lunch.

[ "chronologically endowed" is a term that appears in
this month's print edition of Plesmans' Computing Canada, in an article
claiming us old-guard are somehow resistant to innovative technologies
(to which I say "we just know a bad idea when we see one") and no,
I'm not forgetting the utter irony that this lowly weblog posting
will probably result in more eyeballs on Dave Webb's article than it's
being posted as a front-page item on itbusiness.ca -- gm ]

posted 03/22/2002 - 14:28


Filed under  //   blogging   journalism   new media   technology  
Viewed 2318 times - Favorited 0 times

Comments [0]

About

Our life has no end in just the way in which our visual field has no limits.